So far all of our models look only at the atmosphere and carbon dioxide which is only on one side of the surface. Example the human body generates its own heat, an extra blanket not only adds to the warmth kept in but allows the body to keep more of its own warmth in by not loosing it.

The earth is a producer of its own internal heat, that is what I was taught in school many years ago.
Not one of our models look at internal heating and our planet is warming faster than all the models that predict effects only above the surface.

Heat up the planet sure the water level rises, but now try heating under the Antarctic ice not just from above and while we are at it lets look at our body again. Blood in the morning is thicker and more of a health risk until we have completed our first hour of movement and it flows more freely.

If this same deal applies to the earth more free flowing magma below let’s talk volcanoes and plate movement with all the resulting earthquakes and tidal waves that result. Climate change and our current response, in short a joke, a monstrous joke that we will live to regret.

And yes, I have seen Bill Butler’s article. Good arguments too.

I will also feature the other two articles you have mention.

I am not an authority on this topic. I am just an aggregator sharing my personal opinions too. And I do not speak the absolute truth.

http://news.independent.co.uk/environment/climate_change/article2355956.ece
http://environment.guardian.co.uk/climatechange/story/0,,2026125,00.html
http://www.durangobill.com/Swindle_Swindle.html

the scientific consensus ie the IPCC http://www.ipcc.ch/ is

Most of (>50% of) the observed increase in globally averaged temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely (confidence level >90%) due to the observed increase in anthropogenic (human) greenhouse gas concentrations.

is the consensus from
* 2500+ scientific expert reviewers
* 850+ Contributing authors
* 450+ lead authors

what qualifies you better than them?